Posted by: smstrouse | August 4, 2016

Can We Bridge the Partisan Divide?

51lRMs9372L._SX321_BO1,204,203,200_

Mark Gerzon thinks so. Or so he claims in his book  The Reunited States of America: How We Can Bridge the Partisan Divide. 

Here’s what caught my attention:
The U.S motto is “E Pluribus Unam”–“out of many, one” – but you’d never know it now, says activist Mark Gerzon. The United States seems hopelessly divided. In the past, Americans could disagree without demonizing each other. But now healthy partisan debate has been replaced by brutal political brawling, where nothing but winning matters. Loyalty to party has replaced love of country. The solution, says Gerson, is to become transpartisan. This doesn’t mean adopting a new set of political beliefs. “Transpartisan” is an adjective, not another “ism.” You can be a transpartisan Democrat, a transpartisan Republican, or a transpartisan independent. It is about the how, not the what, a way of conducting politics and solving problems that is the opposite of the hyperpartisanship destroying our country.

imagesThat paragraph arrived in my Inbox from the Charter for Compassion, promoting their new global book study. The idea is to read the book individually, host book clubs, form discussion groups, etc. Then there will be an on-line discussion led by the author.

I didn’t think too much about it until I had dinner with a friend a few nights ago. Margaret (not her real name) is my polar opposite on the political spectrum. We’ve dealt with that mostly by staying away from political topics. That’s getting pretty hard to do, though, in this election cycle. What struck me in our conversation was Margaret’s longing for a respectful dialogue with those of differing opinions. But we both acknowledged that those kinds of discussions don’t happen anymore. And if they do happen, they need to be carefully moderated by someone able to maintain a safe space for everyone.

she-likes-itThat’s the same process I describe in The INTRAfaith Conversation! Maybe it’s the beginning of a movement. I decided that I needed to join the book study and ordered The Reunited States of America. 

I hope he does have some good advice. God knows, this country needs some help – not to become great again or to boast about how great we already are, but how to talk to one another again in a civil manner.

The presentation and discussion led by Mark Gerzon will be September 17 at 9:00 am PDT and you do have to register.

But give it some thought. Join me in at least maybe the beginning of a bridge building project across our partisan divide. I guess you could call it the INTRApolitical conversation. Who knows? Maybe at our next dinner Margaret and I will finally be able to talk about politics.

Posted by: smstrouse | July 28, 2016

Remembering Shirley Chisholm

chisholm-640.jpg__640x360_q85_crop_upscaleI had tears in my eyes as I listened to Michelle Obama at the Democratic convention.

For a lot of reasons.

Many have already covered her brilliant speech. But I was remembering Jesse Jackson and Oprah, with tears in their eyes when President Obama was elected.

CoXsLzCW8AQPe_q.jpg-largeWe are now poised to elect the first woman president of the United States. And that is no small thing. Just 20 years ago, Wal-Mart refused to carry this shirt because the message “goes against Wal-Mart’s family values.” N0w, Wal-Mart no longer stands by that statement. But if you think we’re a post-sexist society, think again.

So when I think about Shirley Chisholm’s run for the presidency in 1972, I’m overwhelmed by her courage. I remember it well. Back then, I couldn’t even be an acolyte, let alone a pastor. That was the way it was. As a kid, I’d learned what I was allowed to do and not allowed to do (or wasn’t proper) because I was a girl. That continued into womanhood. So Shirley Chisholm was a revelation. Maybe that’s why that’s the same year I helped the young girls of the First Lutheran Church in Jamestown, NY make and win their case for becoming acolytes. It sounds so dumb now, doesn’t it? But it was a battle then – and a sweet victory.

I was ordained in a church that has declared it would never call a woman pastor. After the service, Bishop Ed Perry came up to me and said, “Well, I’ve walked all around the building and I didn’t see one crack in the foundation.” Ask any woman in ministry her stories, if not of outright discrimination, then of sexual harassment, inappropriate comments and touching, commentary on clothing and hair, and inquisitions about relationships, possible pregnancies, etc.

And let’s not even begin talking about authority and power.

Or rather, let’s. Only “uppity women” aspire to positions of authority and power. You’d think we’d be beyond this by now, but we’re not. Read this article about Hillary Clinton (written by a man, by the way), especially beginning with the tenth paragraph: “My current conviction is that the main fuel that powers the anti-Hillary crowd is sexism. And yes I’m serious. So go ahead and roll your eyes. Get it over with. But I think the evidence supports my view, and I’ve seen no other plausible explanation. And just to be clear, I don’t think it’s ONLY sexism. But I do think that this is the primary force that has generated and maintained most of the negative narratives about Hillary.”

So even when Hillary is elected (please God!), make no mistake, she will face the same kind of obstruction that President Obama has faced from the neanderthals among us – even though, as a Huffington Post article proclaims, Americans Are Finally Comfortable With The Idea Of A Female Presidential Nominee.

Sheesh! I used to wonder years ago, after one more person (usually an older woman) came out of church where I’d been a guest pastor and said, “I never thought I’d like a woman pastor, but you’re alright.” It was meant as a compliment, but I always wanted to ask, “What did you think a woman pastor was going to do?”

So I’m remembering Shirley Chisholm as I continue to watch the convention with smiles and tears. And I’m honoring her witness. As her book – and her gravestone – proclaim “Unbought and Unbossed”

Hooray for uppity women!

 

10211114_111297180772

Posted by: smstrouse | July 20, 2016

Going to Hell at the Republican Convention?

 

 

Infierno2

 

Infierno, Alberto Vincente Ortiz

 

On the last day of NAINConnect 2016 in Guadalajara, we went on a tour of Tlaquepaque, a tourist-y area known for its decorative arts and crafts. A highlight was the Museo Regional de la Cerámica, representing the various indigenous cultures of Mexico. 

At one point, a friend pointed out this piece entitled “Infierno,” the artist’s rendition of Hell and declared  that was where I’d be going. 

I joked back that it was good I didn’t believe in Hell, at least not in that version of it. However, I had to admit that there were times I wish I did because there are certain people who deserve a place in it, notably George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld. 

Do I actually want to consign these criminals to the fires of Hell? OK, maybe not. Still I’d sure like to see some kind of punishment meted out and am frustrated by the lack of accountability for their actions.

I’m feeling the same kind of anger and frustration as I get reports from the Republican convention (I can’t bear to watch it). In the opening “prayer,” Pastor Mark Burns, an evangelical prosperity gospel televangelist from South Carolina, declared that “our enemy is Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party” and that Donald Trump is the one to whom God is giving the words to “unite this party, this country, that we together can defeat the liberal Democratic Party, to keep us divided and not united. Because we are the United States of America, and we are the conservative party under God.” 

I confess: I am tempted to respond to Mark Burns with “Go to Hell!”

El Infierno.jpg
El Infierno, Adelaida Pascual Gonzales

Then there’s Rudy Giuliani, ranting about President Obama’s so-called failures and touting the virtues of Trump. He’s either delusional or intentionally lying for is own political reasons. Either way, I want to say, “Rudy, go to Hell!”

Next up is Chris Christie, who auditioned for the job of attorney general by conducting a mock prosecution of Hillary Clinton. In the process, he worked the crowd into a frenzy, shouting “Guilty!” and “Lock her up!” For a truly frightening look at the mob scene, watch Stephen Colbert’s opening monologue on The Late Show (start at 5:30 if you don’t want to watch the whole things – but why wouldn’t you?). Governor Christie, for your part in shutting down the George Washington Bridge at rush hour and for your collusion in the coronation of Trump, I say “Go to Hell!”

And as amusing as the Melania Trump plagiarizing scandal has been, it’s got nothing on these characters. Even Donald Trump himself can be excused in a way. He is what he is. From the beginning, The Huffington Post has been adding this paragraph at the end of each Trump story: 
Editor’s note: Donald Trump regularly incites political violence and is a serial liarrampant xenophoberacistmisogynist and birther who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims ― 1.6 billion members of an entire religion ― from entering the U.S.

So, while I don’t make excuses for him, he’s only the harvest of the seeds that the Republican Party has been sowing since Obama’s election. And as disgusted as I am by him, I put more blame on those who – for whatever their reasons – have jumped onto his bandwagon. It’s to them I direct my own rant of “Go to Hell!”

And now, having vented, I’m feeling chastened by my lack of charity, my straying from the path of my own belief in every person as a child of God, and from Martin Luther’s explanation of the 8th Commandment:
You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor.
What does this mean? We should fear and love God so that we do not tell lies about our neighbors, betray them, slander them, or hurt their reputation, but defend them, speak well of them, and explain everything in the kindest way.

But oh, how hard these people are making it! What’s a progressive Christian to do? If I can’t count on the fires of Hell to give them their comeuppance, where can I go for justice and accountability? 

I don’t have any answers other than to participate in the democratic process, vote according to the teachings of Rabbi Jesus, and work for justice however we can. It’s too easy to shout “Go to Hell!” The work is – and always will be – harder than that. 

Still, I confess: it felt good to rant, at least for just a little while. 

 

PS – Check out my other blog, The INTRAfaith Conversation at https://intrafaithconversation.com

 

 

 

 

 

Posted by: smstrouse | July 7, 2016

The Christ-Likeness of Elie Weisel

elie-wieselI don’t know what the person who wrote this comment after the article meant: “I do not agree with his religious beliefs, but he has certainly lived what he speaks about and that is how respect is earned.”

I’m not criticizing; he or she obviously has respect for Elie Wiesel. The commentator could be either a Christian disagreeing with Wiesel’s Judaism or an atheist in opposition to any expression of religion at all. I don’t know; it really doesn’t matter.

What got me thinking was how Wiesel transcended religious labels and calls us to a common humanity and a common wisdom. Many of the quotes I’ve been reading since his death last week have resonated with my own understanding of Christianity.

Now, don’t be alarmed. I’m not calling Elie Wiesel an “anonymous Christian” or somehow denigrating Judaism. What I’m saying is that in my understanding, Christ is bigger than the historical Jesus. In fact, we might even have other names for “it”: Buddha nature, the Tao, the Universe. So themes of grace, hope, suffering, resurrection, incarnation, light, love – which I find in abundance in my Christian tradition – can be found in others’ as well. Such as in these:

We know that every moment is a moment of grace, every hour an offering; not to share them would mean to betray them. Our lives no longer belong to us alone; they belong to all those who need us desperately.

People say occasionally that there must be light at the end of the tunnel, but I believe in those times there was light in the tunnel. The strange way there was courage in the ghetto, and there was hope, human hope, in the death camps. Simply an anonymous prisoner giving a piece of his bread to someone who was hungrier than he or she; a father shielding his child; a mother trying to hold back her tears so her children would not see her pain—that was courage.

I know and I speak from experience, that even in the midst of darkness, it is possible to create light and share warmth with one another; that even on the edge of the abyss, it is possible to dream exalted dreams of compassion; that it is possible to be free and strengthen the ideals of freedom, even within prison walls; that even in exile, friendship becomes an anchor.

I cannot cure everybody. I cannot help everybody. But to tell the lonely person that I am not far or different from that lonely person, that I am with him or her, that’s all I think we can do and we should do.

Every moment is a new beginning.

You don’t have to be a Christian to be Christ-like. Elie Wiesel embodied a wisdom for all of humanity.

Posted by: smstrouse | June 30, 2016

Interfaith Headcoverings?

18-oz-chow-chowSeveral years ago, when I was back home in Pennsylvania, I asked our music director/ administrative assistant, Orion Pitts, if he wanted me to bring him anything. Since Orion is also from PA Dutch country, I figured he might need to stock up on pot pie noodles, pretzels, or apple butter. What he asked for was a jar of chow chow (for the uninitiated, chow chow is a pickled relish made with a variety of vegetables).

I bought a large jar before I headed to the Philadelphia airport and tucked it into my carry-on bag for safe-keeping. When I went through security, I was pulled out of line and asked what was in the jar. “Chow chow,” I said, never expecting that a PA Dutch condiment would be seen as a threat. But it was. Orion’s chow chow was confiscated. Thankfully I wasn’t detained as a potential Amish terrorist.

mennonite3Why am I thinking about this incident when I’m writing about head coverings? Because our speakers for our Pluralism Summer series this week are members of the Mennonite church. I grew up among Mennonites in PA, so I’m remembering the bonnets worn by some women and girls in both Amish and Mennonite communities. The basis for these coverings is most definitely a religious one, based on Bible passages such as 1 Tim. 2:9-15, 1 Peter 3:1-6, Titus 2:3-5, and 1 Corinthians 11:2-16.

Now, I may have some very different opinions and interpretations about these texts, but I do respect the right of members of a religious tradition to wear symbols of their beliefs.

13232977_1026611920756632_1392011378623740304_nrastafarian-hat21cp_yomkippur003_24326776_ver1.0_640_480Unknown

Of course, it becomes problematic when it comes to women because patriarchy raises its ugly head. Most of the reasons for women covering their hair involve modesty, but there’s also a measure of subordination to men involved – including the Mennonite/Amish tradition. It’s always good to hear of women in all of the religious traditions questioning and/or rejecting these reasons – whether or not they continue to cover.

I don’t have a problem with anyone’s head-gear – as long as it’s freely chosen. I can’t imagine the any woman other than the most burkaseverely oppressed and brainwashed to freely choose to wear a burka. Bhijab1ut the hijab is a different. Again: I don’t have a problem with the hijab as long as it’s freely chosen. There is so much hostility these days towards Islam, including calls to ban the head covering entirely. And some of that is in response to its perceived
symbol of male oppression.

I’m not even going to get into all of that right now. I’m just wondering: will we have the nerve to include other religious groups that require women to cover their hair, including  Orthodox Jews, Sikhs, Amish, and Mennonites?

 

 

 

Posted by: smstrouse | June 25, 2016

I Pity the Poor Immigrant

images

The Supreme Court dashed the hopes of millions of immigrants this week when it was deadlocked over United States v. Texas, No. 15-674. This is the case that opposed the 2014 executive action taken by President Obama to shield as many as 5 million undocumented immigrants from deportation and allowed them to legally work in the US.

The proposed program, Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) would give unauthorized immigrants who were parents of either citizens or of lawful permanent residents the possibility of obtaining work permits.

But the Supreme Court is down to 8 members due to th2016-06-23t22-32-03-166z--1280x720.nbcnews-ux-1080-600e death of Antonin Scalia in
February and the refusal of Republicans to consider the appointment of  Judge Merrick B. Garland, the president’s nominee to fill the vacancy. The 4-4 tie leaves in place an appeals court ruling blocking the plan. According to the terse wording of the decision: “The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court.”

So in the midst of our splintered political system, this is just one more example of how real people are forced to suffer.

At an anti-racism workshop I attended today, we were asked the question: why should we as Christians care about ending racism? We were supposed to come up with a 6-word answer. In my small group I suggested we could cut it down to one: Duh! Of course we went on from there to expand on that flippant response.

It’s the same answer for caring for the plight of immigrants. Jesus was all about crossing boundaries, including people considered to be “other,” showing compassion, and healing what was broken – both people and systems. How can a Christian not be in favor – at least – of helping immigrant623supreme-court-immigrations who are parents of people who are already citizens or lawful permanent residents? We’re talking about families, for God’s sake.

 In our Pluralism Summer series, we’ve asked our guest speakers to address the question: how does your tradition inform your politics? In my opinion, the only answer a follower of Jesus could possibly give is to side with the justices who voted against the appeal. And if anyone has any doubts about the far-reaching implications of Supreme Court appointments, this should convince them.

In the meantime, we continue to care for those caught in the middle – in both our thoughts and prayers and our actions – which include getting into the voting booth and voting as a follower of Jesus.

Unknown

I get so tired of hearing statements from people that Muslims have to speak up against violence committed in the name of Islam. It’s obvious that they’re either not looking in the right places (although these responses are hard to miss) or they’re just blinded to the fact that most Muslims are appalled by these attacks – and frightened by the Islamaphobia that gets ramped up even further.

So – here is a whole list of statements from Islamic organizations. The next time some fool says it’s time for the Muslim community to sopeak out, hand them this. Hopefully it will do some good.

The following links will bring you to the webpages of major Islamic organizations in America giving their response to the slaughter in Orlando. From the US Council of Muslim Organizations USCMO CONDEMNS THE ORLANDO SHOOTING (Washington, D.C., 6/12/2016) – The US Council of Muslim Organizations (USCMO), the largest coalition of leading national and local Muslim organizations, expresses its horror […]

via Statements From American Islamic Organizations on the Orlando Massacre — A Center of Christian-Muslim Engagement for Peace and Justice: News and Views

Posted by: smstrouse | June 11, 2016

Yoga & Politics?!

swami11How does your
tradition/spirituality/

philospophy
inform how you think about politics?

That’s the question we’re asking our speakers for this year’s Pluralism Summer.

Our guest tomorrow is Swami Ramandanda
from the Integral Yoga Institute of San Francisco.

Pluralism Sunday began some years ago as an initiative of progressivechristianity.org.
But at First United we decided that one Sunday wasn’t enough. So now, for the fourth year, we’re embarking on a summer of interfaith exploration. Each week a speaker from a different tradition will address the question of religion and politics within our regular Sunday service.

Our service, while rooted in our Christian tradition, is decidedly interspiritual. For a description of what it means to be an interspiritual Christian, read my blog post here.

Everyone is welcome – those of all faiths and of no faith. Visitors are invited to participate in the service to the extent that you are comfortable.

5:00 pm
First United Lutheran Chiruch
2097 Turk Street (at Lyon)
San Francisco, CA

For more information, contact me.

June 11, 2016

Posted by: smstrouse | June 7, 2016

Pluralism Summer: Week 1

HOW DOES YOUR
RELIGIOUS/ SPIRITUAL/ PHILOSOPHICAL TRADITION
images
INFORM HOW YOU THINK ABOUT POLITICS?

Each Sunday, a speaker from different religious/ spiritual/ philosophical tradition will address this timely question within an interspiritual service.
Those of all faiths or no faith are welcome!

Sunday, June 12 @5:00 PM
First United Lutheran Church
2097 Turk Street (@ Lyon), San Francisco

June 12       Swami Ramananda, Integral Yoga Institute San Francisco
President of the Integral Yoga Institute and greatly respected senior teacher in the Integral Yoga tradition, which is a synthesis of the various branches of Yoga.

June 19       Rita Semel, Temple Emanu-El
Co-founder: Interfaith Center at the Presidio, United Religions Initiative, and the San Francisco Interfaith Council

 

June 26       Dr. Peter Erlenwein
Peter Erlenwein is a sociopsychologist and transpersonal therapist from Germany. His work and life has been deeply inspired by his decade long intercultural studies in India and Namiba and his collaboration with laureates of the Alternative Nobel Prize in Germany. He has recently written a book called And I Saw the Heavens Open: Spirituality This Side and Beyond Religion.

July 3          Ed Driskill and Jim Lichti, First Mennonite Church of San Francisco

July 10        Dolores White, Baha’i Community of Martinez, CA
Former board member Interfaith Center at the Presidio and the Contra Costa County Interfaith Council. Certified Laughter Yoga leader.

17               Middle Circle

24              TBA

July 31        Laura Magnani, American Friends Service Committee
Director of AFSC’s Bay Area Healing Justice Program. Author of America’s First Penitentiary: A 200 Year Old Failure; co-author of AFSC publication, “Beyond Prisons: A New Interfaith Paradigm for Our Failed Prison System.”

August 7        TBA

August 14       Mark Carlson, Director of the Lutheran Office of Public Policy–CA

August 21       TBA

August 28             Hatice Yildiz, Pacifica Institute
Doctoral student, Graduate Theological Union

Pluralism Summer is an initiative of First United Lutheran Church, a progressive church, rooted in the Reformation tradition, which says that the church, our worship, and our music must always be re-forming. We believe that it’s more important to ask the questions than to know all the answers.

We believe that, as theologian Hans Kung wrote:
“There will be no peace among the nations until there is peace among the religions.  There will be no peace among the religions until there is dialogue among the religions.”

At First United, we believe our wisdom will only be enhanced by continued conversation with all of our neighbors. Together we work for peace, justice, and the good of all people and all creation.

Posted by: smstrouse | June 2, 2016

Pluralism Summer: Week 1

 HOW DOES YOUR
RELIGIOUS/ SPIRITUAL/ PHILOSOPHICAL TRADITION
images
INFORM HOW YOU THINK ABOUT POLITICS?

Each Sunday, a speaker from different religious/ spiritual/ philosophical tradition will address this timely question within an interspiritual service.

(What is interspiritual?)

Sunday, June 12 @5:00 PM
First United Lutheran Church
2097 Turk Street (@ Lyon)
San Francisco

Oswami11pening up this summer’s series on religion and politics:
Swami Ramananda
from  the  Integral Yoga Institute in San Francisco

“Swami Ramananda is the President of the Integral Yoga Institute in San Francisco and a greatly respected senior teacher in the Integral Yoga tradition, who has been practicing Yoga for over 35 years. Ramananda offers practical methods of integrating the timeless teachings and practices of yoga into daily life, and transforming the painful aspects of human experience into steps toward realizing one’s full potential.

“Ramananda trains Yoga teachers to bring Yoga into corporate, hospital and medical settings and has taught mind/body wellness programs in many locations. He is a founding board member of the Yoga Alliance, a national registry that supports and promotes yoga teachers as professionals. His warmth, wisdom and sense of humor have endeared him to many.”   http://integralyogasf.org/teacher-training/staff/

 
Pluralism Summer is an initiative of First United Lutheran Church, a progressive church, rooted in the Reformation tradition, which says that the church, our worship, and our music must always be re-forming. We believe that it’s more important to ask the questions than to know all the answers.

We believe that, as theologian Hans Kung wrote:
“There will be no peace among the nations until there is peace among the religions.  There will be no peace among the religions until there is dialogue among the religions.”

At First United, we believe our wisdom will only be enhanced by continued conversation with all of our neighbors. Together we work for peace, justice, and the good of all people and all creation.

 

Older Posts »

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 618 other followers